Rare Bravery Award for Maori Fireman

One of the supporters of our research has been Scott Shadbolt, a Ngai Tahu Urban Search and Rescue who performed a double amputation with a hacksaw and a Leatherman knife on Brian Coker inside the Pyne Gould Corporation building. The Valour Medal, the firefighters equivalent of the Victoria Cross, has only been given out three previous times and was last awarded over a century ago.

Scott is married to my colleague Melanie Mark-Shadbolt and is father to four great tamariki.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Post-disaster housing for whanau in Christchurch

A report by Te Puawaitangi ki Otautahi reveals the struggle to find accommodation in the city after the earthquakes. Their survey found that housing has ‘declined dramatically’ with the standard of most housing deteriorating and the high costs of private rental meaning many whanau have to share their home with extended family, sometimes having to relocate outside of the city.

A key challenge is finding warm dry affordable housing.

As a result of poor housing, health risks have increased, particularly skin infections and respiratory problems, anxiety and stress.

Babies are at higher risk to SIDS.

Difficult to see this situation improving quickly. Many of us recall the Minister of Earthquake Recovery saying ‘the market’ will provide solutions for the post-disaster landscape.

He’s dead right. This is what a market solution looks like.

Full report available here

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Research, reportage, and debate

A recent Press article which I and others were interviewed for has revealed a certain dis-ease in the research arena when the article was mentioned in the recent 7th Australasian Natural Hazards Management Conference in Wellington.

Seems our work has been interpreted as a deliberate slur on Ngai Tahu.

Now I know who’s involved (’tis a small world after all…) and I submitted an abstract (not accepted, asked to present a poster which doesn’t justify the cost and time for me).

Pity we’re not asked in directly, but our work is increasingly out there for critique and debate. I’ve mentioned the latest article in a previous post, published in the Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, and another has just been accepted for the MAI Journal in a Special Issue on Indigenous Resilience (to be launched at this year’s Nga Pae conference).

For the record, I think the response was generally very good from all concerned, Maori katoa, Pakeha katoa, Tauiwi katoa. (Others don’t, and I have recorded their views in interviews and presented them to inform the debate).

What I am talking about now (three and a half years after the main event) is recovery, the fourth of the 4 R’s in disaster speak…

I interpret resilience as the ability of an individual or collective to absorb the shock of a disaster and then recover; to merely exist in a post-disaster landscape which is still a hell of an achievement is, for me, endurance.

Endurance will precede resilience but I do not yet see an bounce back in how Maori communities are living in Christchurch (And this position is reinforced by CERA’s ongoing ‘Wellbeing Survey‘, now into its fourth wave…

We are struggling as a society to address the concerns of, among others, Maori and I make no bones about it, I think this sucks and it doesn’t need to be this way.

One of the causal factors for me (and others, the Press article cited the very good Masters thesis by Hauauru Rae from Otago) is that the Crown and its agencies are increasingly focused on Iwi (via iwi authorities) as ‘taking care’ of Maori katoa or nga maata waka/taura here like myself who comprise the majority of Maori in Otautahi/Christchurch…

Yes there is a community forum for non-local Maori to be represented but this is too often peripheral in the power brokerage…the one thing a disaster does is strip away the smoke and mirrors. Too many people exist in a state of permanent emergency, a disaster merely ‘bring[s] to the surface the poverty which characterises the lives of so many inhabitants” (Hardoy and Satterthwaite 1989, p. 203).

Hard rain’s gonna fall…

We will continue our research and publish through the academic channels – that’s important – but we will also post and present at conferences and community meetings, and we will talk and laugh face-to-face, if we get the invite ;)

Hardoy, J.E. and D. Satterthwaite (1989), Squatter Citizen: Life in the Urban Third World, Earthscan, London

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Maori Disaster and Emergency Management: Taking Maori from the edge of disasters to the centre of influence

Pleased to announce we have been successful in this years Vision Matauranga round. We know Maori institutions and cultural practices played an integral part in the disaster response to the Christchurch earthquakes of 2010-12. This response from Maori was spontaneously extended to include non-Maori support through well-established but dynamic and evolving Maori cultural networks. Local Maori insights (both Ngāi Tahu and Ngā Maata Waka/Taura Here) were particularly valuable in supporting the vulnerable city residents including the elderly and mental health clients. Maori, both individually and collectively, operated alongside first responder organisations such as the Fire Service and Police, government and NGO officials, iwi authorities, international emergency workers, churches and volunteers.

This project aims to improve engagement between Maori and mainstream disaster and emergency organisations to enable Maori to engage as Citizen Scientists and in turn enable more efficient responses to future disasters, whether that be in the rescue of survivors, the provision of emergency supplies, medical care, emergency repairs and ongoing pastoral support.

Programme leader, Dr. Simon Lambert (Ngati Ruapani ki Waikaremoana/Tuhoe)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Latest journal article just published

Hot off the academic press is our latest journal article, published in the Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies. I argue that Indigenous Peoples retain traditional coping strategies for disasters despite the marginalisation of many Indigenous communities. The article describes the response of Māori to the Christchurch earthquakes of 2010 and 2012 through analyses of available statistical data and reports, and interviews done three months and one year after the most damaging event. A significant difference between Māori and ‘mainstream’ New Zealand was the greater mobility enacted by Māori throughout this period, with organisations having roles beyond their traditional catchments throughout the disaster, including important support for non-Māori. Informed engagement with Indigenous communities, acknowledging their internal diversity and culturally nuanced support networks, would enable more efficient disaster responses in many countries.


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Maori Well-being still bad across Otautahi

Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority’s latest Well-being survey , the fourth, shows Maori well-being still a stubbornly low.

This survey, capturing participants self-reported well-being and experiences in April of this year, show dissatisfaction increasing for several groups. The participation of Māori in mainstream disaster management is nuanced and not amenable to a simplistic template to account for all Māori. Also we can and often do identify with more than one iwi, and many of us cannot or do not identify to any iwi and Pakeha thinking still struggles with our diversity!

These results are frightening.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

HRC Hui Whakapiripiri 2014

Just back from HRC’s Hui Whakapiripiri in Tamaki Makaurau where I presented an update on our research. We know that the recent (and ongoing) earthquakes in Christchurch have radically altered the physical and psycho-social landscapes of the city. I presented two analyses of data collected in collaboration with Te Awa o te Ora, a Kaupapa Maori service provider in the dynamic post-disaster contexts of a devastated city. Semi-structured interviews with Tangata Whaiora provide rich narratives of personal experiences of a massive urban disaster with key themes of family, housing and accommodation, and rapid service provider support.

This data also enables a Social Network Analysis of support networks in which key nodes and pathways outline geographies of care and trust which are culturally attuned to leverage off Maori institutions and practices. Results point to a more efficient and comprehensive coverage by a Kaupapa Maori provider for what is too often considered a vulnerable community but whose experiences actually point to a great resilience.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Ru Whenua work acknowledged: Heroism award to Ngai Tahu Fireman

Māori researchers at Lincoln University extend congratulations to Scott Shadbolt (Ngāi Tahu – Taumutu/Moeraki) who was awarded the New Zealand Bravery Medal for his heroic efforts as a NZ Fire Service Urban Search and Rescue first responder in the rubble of Christchurch after the disastrous earthquake on February 22, 2011.

Scott was also the first participant in research lead by Dr Simon Lambert (Ngāti Ruapani/Tuhoe) Senior Lecturer in Māori Environmental Planning and Development in the Faculty of Environment, Society and Design. This research – presented at the 2012 International Indigenous Development Conference in Auckland – showed how the ‘strength and resilience of Māori cultural values and skills’ came to the fore in the immediate disaster response. The research also found Māori resilience to be ‘culturally attuned’ and that better engagement with marae, kura, hapū and iwi as well as pan-iwi organisations would ‘expand the possibilities for better disaster preparation and improved post-disaster recoveries.’

Leadership such as that displayed by Scott and others was integral to the rapid response. A second paper (co-authored by Scott’s wife, Lincoln researcher Melanie Mark-Shadbolt (Ngāti Kahungunu, Te Arawa, Ngāti Porou), discussed issues of leadership which are ‘woven through both formal and informal investigations and debates’ in the drawn out recovery phase.

This has been particularly evident in current research by Dr Lambert with Te Awa o Te Ora Trust, a Kaupapa Māori provider of wraparound mental health services in Christchurch. Funded by Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga, a Centre of Research Excellence based at the University of Auckland, this research has enabled the voices of Tangata Whaiora (‘People seeking health’) to be heard.

Findings are soon to be published, however preliminary results show that the drawn-out nature of the rebuild/recovery period is placing enormous stress on individuals and whānau. For Māori, the networks of support that are accessed are not necessarily known or acknowledged by mainstream organisations, and one of the intended outcomes of this project is to facilitate better engagement of Māori institutions into Aotearoa New Zealand’s disaster and emergency management strategies.

Once again ka nui te mihi ki a koe Scott, he toa, he rangatira!

Updates to this research are regularly posted on the Lincoln University ‘Conversations’ webpage www.lincoln.ac.nz/conversation/maori-resilience/. There is also a Facebook page www.facebook.com/MaoriResilience .

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

IRDR presentation: Integrating Indigenous Knowledge into Decision and Policy-making for Disaster Risk Reduction

Just back from the 2nd International Research on Disaster Risk Conference in Beijing where we presented a summary of our case studies on Indigenous communities and disasters. I was ably supported by my colleague Lun Yin who spoke on his work in the Tibetan mountains.

There were four other cases: Simone Athayde (our project manager) has been working with Indigenous communities impacted by the Bel Monte dam in the Brazilian Amazon; Marie-Ange Baudoin and small-scale farmers in Benin; Victor Okarie and the Nigerian floods of 2012 and climate change; Lun”s work,  and ours on Maori and the Christchurch earthquakes. Our summary was that:

•Indigenous knowledge is uniquely valuable in understanding natural hazards and disasters.

• Participation of Indigenous communities is vital to rapid and effective response and recovery.

• State, local authorities and NGOs need to acknowledge and empower Indigenous communities, especially as these communities engage with corporations and multinationals

• Intra- and Inter-tribal dynamics ensure Indigenous communities remain complex and evolving.

• Ongoing and empowered relationships are a necessity for effective DRR and CCA.

We’re going to be workshopping on all this and more in Florida  by the end of the year.

Two keynotes worth noting are Senator Loren Legarda of the Philippines who spoke of her country’s responses to the devastating Typhoon Haiyan, and Nathan Forbes on ‘Water and Disasters: the impact of thirst’.

Thanks to Lincoln PhD candidate, Roche Mahon, for the pic

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Indigenous resilience: like gravity or democracy?

We’ve been researching the impacts of the 2010-11 earthquakes on Maori in Christchurch since May of 2011.

As well as recording the terrifying and uplifting experiences of over 80 individuals including Maori first responders, parents, teachers, and tangata whaiora (mental health clients), we have accumulated raw data on self-reported wellbeing pre- and post-disaster.

The research has been presented a couple of times now and is to be published in November in a special Issue of the MAI Review which will be launched at this years Nga Pae’s International Indigenous Conference.

Our results show that Maori resilience is neither automatic or improving, with supporting evidence from the third wave of CERA’s Wellbeing Survey which shows an increase in the proportion of Maori less likely to view post-disaster life positively…

CERA Wellbeing Survey, 2012-13

While various definitions are held, there seems to be a reluctance to question the assumption that we are resilient by definition, as Indigenous Peoples.

I see two poles about which we swing. The first accepts resilience is like gravity: always there, unshakable, a ‘given’ in the universe.

The second pole argues that resilience is like democracy, a dynamic configuration of people and institutions with individual and collective actions never quite perfecting things but committed to a process through which empowerment is at least possible.

I argue for the second. And like democracy everywhere, resilience is a fragile thing, balanced on a knife-edge, easily lost and hard to regather.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off